Skip to main content

“So Sad!”

Another article rethinking bilingual education. Massachusetts voted to restrict bilingual education in 2002.

A few thoughts,

Did the voters even know any of the research on this before voting?

Why was this question even on the ballot?

How sad that ELLs had to struggle and fail in full immersion classes for 15 years!

How sad that no one for 15 years could see the, and I quote, “abject failure” of the full immersion program!

How sad that anyone would think a “one size fits all” approach would work for any diverse group of students?

How sad that 15 years had to pass?

So the good news…

After 15 years districts are finally given flexibility to meet the diverse needs of ELLs!

During those 15 years, 64% of ELLs graduated, despite the fact that districts were not permitted to take their students individual language needs into consideration.

https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/massachusetts/articles/2017-06-07/bill-seeks-new-approaches-for-students-learning-language

Comments

  1. I can't believe that voters voted against the ability to teach students in their own language! I also can't believe that it took 15 years to rectify this problem. It is truly remarkable that the graduation rate was as high as it was during that time. I would have expected the rate to be far lower than 64%.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Finally…           Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) now allows states flexibility to assess the growth of English Language Learners (ELLs). No learner is the same including our growing number of ELLs in the United States. It states that now ¼ of all students speak a language other than English at home. ESSA now allows a growth-to-target model. It sets annual and long-term goals based on their baseline test upon entering the US. Each ELL has an individual learning plan. That sounds familiar (IEP). It finally makes some sense now !         “Historically, ELs have often been held accountable for making exactly the same English language growth each year. Trouble is , research reliably shows that different levels of language proficiency take different amounts of time to develop. That is, many students move rapidly from basic to intermediate English language skills but then take longer to move to advance...
Using Technology to Help Our ELL Parents Become More Involved           One key component often left out of the English Language Learners education is the involvement with the students’ families. Technology is one way to accomplish this. Technology allows for translation services and copies of forms and their child’s progress in the parents language. All of these can be easily and readily accessed by the parent on a carefully created website. The problem I foresee and have seen in my own district is the funding and ability to create a site that can effectively include all of this. The new STARR report card and website created by a district in Texas is a glimmer of hope for all districts trying to more effectively and clearly communicate with the parents of ELLs.           It just makes sense to give parents communication in their own language. I know this is the law, but too many district...
Preach It! This recent letter to the editor encompasses many of the blogs I have written about… inequity of English Language Learners (ELLs), dual language programs, and common sense! The writer comes right out and states the problem- racial disparity in many areas specifically in the advanced learner program (AL) as it directly affects the ESL student population, their future and education. The stakes are high. 65% of the student population are ELLS, yet only the other 35% of the population are truly qualified for AL. You are leaving out the majority. Both the MAP and Cogat, needed for entrance into AL are designed for a monolingual student when 65% of the student population is bilingual.   Kristen Marie Scott, teacher at Nuestro Mundo Community School, states the overwhelming obvious truths. After reading these next two quotes by her in her letter to the editor, one might want to say out loud, “Preach It!” “No standardized measure in Spanish has bee...